Wednesday, September 7, 2005



Saturated Yellow Journalism

I’m tired of 24 hour coverage of every unfortunate event on the planet. I think 9/11 was the overload point for me. I think I watched the news for like a week straight, because I, like 250 million other Americans and untold numbers of the rest of the world, wanted to know ‘who the hell did this’ and ‘why’. The news media overloaded us on coverage before 9/11 but for some reason, after that, it was beyond reasonable.

Yellow journalism means to sensationalize the news beyond it’s true meaning in order to increase the number of viewers, and I’d say that the media today goes above and beyond that, looking for every sick and disturbing angle of current events, anything that will take the shock value to another level and get John Q Public’s mouth gaping “Oh my God!” The media rarely ever focuses on anything good these days, instead working hard to insure we are daily saturated with the worst aspects of the human existence. Is it any wonder we have school shootings, children committing heinous crimes at such early ages, when they turn on the television and even the news is a barrage of violence?

Everyday now I get to spend 3 half hour sessions with CNN at the chow hall, and it sickens me. Do I feel bad for the people affected by hurricane Katrina? Yes, of course I do, but I do not need to be inundated, deluged, literally immersed into it day after day after day, in fact, I think at a point the human aspect of this tragedy is lost because we become immune to what we see at some point.

Then of course, to make this particular news event even more ‘yellow’, you have lame brain dipshits like Wolf Shitzer on CNN asking questions like “Do you believe the response to the hurricane would have been much faster had Katrina hit a city populated by predominantly ‘white’ people?” He posed this incredibly racist and ignorant question to a black congressman, and this congressman of course showed his racist side by jumping right on the question, stating that of course the response was slow because the majority of New Orleans is populated by low income African Americans.

If questions like that are acceptable, then how about THIS question? “Do you believe the looting, rapings, beatings, and shootings would not have happened had Katrina hit a city populated by predominantly ‘white’ people?” OH MY, fraNk, how could you say that? Wait, now hold up, BOTH questions are equally unacceptable, what amazes me is that anyone who would call themselves a ‘journalist’ would bring up either question. Race did NOT play a part in the hurricane response, it’s so lame brained an idea.

The ENTIRE infrastructure of New Orleans was GONE, the first responders are normally the city, then state. THEN the Federal kicks in. In this situation, city and state were basically powerless due to the destruction of the infrastructure, no roads, no hospitals, nothing left. So the lack of immediate response shouldn’t fall on the Federal government, it shouldn’t fall on anyone, it’s just the nature of this particular beast, this disaster was beyond what was expected.

But back to my previous topic, about the lootings and rapings, or the response being slow due to the people being ‘poor blacks’, why does race have nothing to do with it? Because let’s say the majority of people left in a city decimated in such a way had been low income whites, those in the trailer parks with the rusted pickups. They would have had the same lawlessness, the same types of crimes being committed. As far as the response being slow, well, I’ve addressed that, and anyone who is still stupid enough to believe there is a racist issue behind it, or even stupider, that the white house didn’t care because they were African Americans, go ahead and wallow in your disgustingly racist fantasy land, you aren’t fooling anyone but yourself.


Current Lyrical Ramblings

I built my life on a rigid frame.
So nothing bends it only breaks into pieces and pieces.
I waited for hope to arrive but it never came.
Leaving me with only pain inside.

The Deep End – Crossfade

2 comments:

Old Grey Frog said...

OK. Didn't understand that last comment...sounded like a commercial to me. Anyway, here's an article that I thought you'd be interested in.

An Unnatural Disaster: A Hurricane Exposes the Man-Made Disaster of
the Welfare State

by Robert Tracinski
Sep 02, 2005

It took four long days for state and federal officials to
figure out how to deal with the disaster in New Orleans. I can't blame them, because it also took me four long days to figure out what was going on there. The reason is that the events there make no sense if you think that we are confronting a natural disaster.

If this is just a natural disaster, the response for public
officials is obvious: you bring in food, water, and doctors; you send
transportation to evacuate refugees to temporary shelters; you send engineers to stop the flooding and rebuild the city's infrastructure. For journalists, natural disasters also have a familiar pattern: the heroism
of ordinary people pulling together to survive; the hard work and dedication of doctors, nurses, and rescue workers; the steps being taken to clean up and rebuild.

Public officials did not expect that the first thing they
would have to do is to send thousands of armed troops in armored vehicle, as if they are suppressing an enemy insurgency. And journalists, myself included, did not expect that the story would not be about rain, wind, and flooding, but about rape, murder, and looting.

But this is not a natural disaster. It is a man-made disaster.

The man-made disaster is not an inadequate or incompetent
response by federal relief agencies, and it was not directly caused by Hurricane Katrina. This is where just about every newspaper and television channel has gotten the story wrong.

The man-made disaster we are now witnessing in New Orleans
did not happen over four days last week. It happened over the past four decades. Hurricane Katrina merely exposed it to public view.

The man-made disaster is the welfare state.

For the past few days, I have found the news from New Orleans
to be confusing. People were not behaving as you would expect them to behave in an emergency indeed, they were not behaving as they have behaved in other emergencies. That is what has shocked so many people: they have been saying that this is not what we expect from America. In fact, it is not even what we expect from a Third World country.

When confronted with a disaster, people usually rise to the
occasion. They work together to rescue people in danger, and they
spontaneously organize to keep order and solve problems. This is
especially true in America. We are an enterprising people, used to
relying on our own initiative rather than waiting around for the
government to take care of us. I have seen this a hundred times, in small examples (a small town whose main traffic light had gone out, causing ordinary citizens to get out of their cars and serve as impromptu traffic cops, directing cars through the intersection) and large ones (the spontaneous response of New Yorkers to September 11).

So what explains the chaos in New Orleans?

To give you an idea of the magnitude of what is going on,
here is a description from a Washington Times story:

"Storm victims are raped and beaten; fights erupt with flying
fists, knives and guns; fires are breaking out; corpses litter the
streets; and police and rescue helicopters are repeatedly fired on.

"The plea from Mayor C. Ray Nagin came even as National Guardsmen poured in to restore order and stop the looting, carjackings
and gunfire....

"Last night, Gov. Kathleen Babineaux Blanco said 300
Iraq-hardened Arkansas National Guard members were inside New Orleans with shoot-to-kill orders.

" 'These troops are...under my orders to restore order in the
streets,' she said. 'They have M-16s, and they are locked and loaded. These troops know how to shoot and kill and they are more than willing to do so if necessary and I expect they will.' "

The reference to Iraq is eerie. The photo that accompanies
this article shows a SWAT team with rifles and armored vests riding on an armored vehicle through trash-strewn streets lined by a rabble of squalid, listless people, one of whom appears to be yelling at them. It looks exactly like a scene from Sadr City in Baghdad.

What explains bands of thugs using a natural disaster as an excuse for an orgy of looting, armed robbery, and rape? What causes
unruly mobs to storm the very buses that have arrived to evacuate them, causing the drivers to speed away, frightened for their lives? What causes people to attack the doctors trying to treat patients at the Superdome?

Why are people responding to natural destruction by causing
further destruction? Why are they attacking the people who are trying to help them?

My wife, Sherri, figured it out first, and she figured it out
on a sense-of-life level. While watching the coverage one night on Fox News Channel, she told me that she was getting a familiar feeling. She studied architecture at the Illinois Institute of Chicago, which is located in the South Side of Chicago just blocks away from the Robert Taylor Homes, one of the largest high-rise public housing projects in
America. "The projects," as they were known, were infamous for
uncontrollable crime and irremediable squalor. (They have since, mercifully, been demolished.)

What Sherri was getting from last night's television coverage
was a whiff of the sense of life of "the projects." Then the
"crawl the informational phrases flashed at the bottom of the screen on most news channels gave some vital statistics to confirm this sense: 75% of the residents of New Orleans had already evacuated before the hurricane, and of those who remained, a large number were from the city's
public housing projects. Jack Wakeland then told me that early reports from CNN and Fox indicated that the city had no plan for evacuating all of the prisoners in the city's jails so they just let many of them loose. [Update: I have been searching for news reports on this last story, but I have not been able to confirm it. Instead, I have found numerous reports about the collapse of the corrupt and incompetent New
Orleans Police Department; see here and here.]

There is no doubt a significant overlap between these two
populations--that is, a large number of people in the jails used to live in the housing projects, and vice versa.

There were many decent, innocent people trapped in New Orleans when the deluge hits but they were trapped alongside large numbers of people from two groups: criminals,and wards of the welfare
state, people selected, over decades, for their lack of initiative and self-induced helplessness. The welfare wards were a mass of sheep on
whom the incompetent administration of New Orleans unleashed a pack of wolves.

All of this is related, incidentally, to the incompetence of the city government, which failed to plan for a total evacuation of the city, despite the knowledge that this might be necessary. In a city corrupted by the welfare state, the job of city officials is to ensure the flow of handouts to welfare and political
supporters "not to ensure a lawful, orderly evacuation in case of emergency.

No one has really reported this story, as far as I can tell.
In fact, some are already actively distorting it, blaming President Bush, for example, for failing to personally ensure that the Mayor of New Orleans had drafted an adequate evacuation plan. The worst example is an execrable piece from the Toronto Globe and Mail, by a supercilious Canadian who blames the chaos on American "individualism." But the truth is precisely the opposite: the chaos was caused by a system that was the exact opposite of individualism. What Hurricane Katrina exposed was the psychological consequences of the welfare state. What we consider "normal" behavior in
an emergency is behavior that is normal for people who have values and take the responsibility to pursue and protect them. People with values respond to a disaster by fighting against it and doing whatever it takes to overcome the difficulties they face. They don't sit around and complain that the government hasn't taken care of them. And they don't use the chaos of a disaster as an opportunity to prey on their fellow men. But what about criminals and welfare parasites? Do they worry about saving their houses and property? They don't, because they don't
own anything. Do they worry about what is going to happen to their
businesses or how they are going to make a living? They never worried about those things before. Do they worry about crime and looting? But living off of stolen wealth is a way of life for them.

People living in piles of their own trash, while petulantly
complaining that other people aren't doing enough to take care of them and then shooting at those who come to rescue themâ?"this is not just a description of the chaos at the Superdome. It is a perfect summary of the 40-year history of the welfare state and its public housing projects.

The welfare states and the brutish, uncivilized mentality it
sustains and encourages, is the man-made disaster that explains the moral ugliness that has swamped New Orleans. And that is the story that no one is reporting.

Source: TIA Daily -- September 2, 2005

Old Grey Frog said...

You poor people! CNN?! What the heck?!